Suchergebnisse
Filter
9 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Seeing Us in Them: Social Divisions and the Politics of Group Empathy
In: Political science quarterly: a nonpartisan journal devoted to the study and analysis of government, politics and international affairs ; PSQ, Band 137, Heft 3, S. 614-615
ISSN: 1538-165X
American Rage: How Anger Shapes Our Politics. By Steven W. Webster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. 169p. $89.99 cloth, $29.99 paper
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 639-640
ISSN: 1541-0986
Black Hope Floats: Racial Emotion Regulation and the Uniquely Motivating Effects of Hope on Black Political Participation
Drawing upon theories of group based emotion, group based efficacy and appraisal, I propose a model of racial emotion regulation to explain variations in how Black and White Americans respond emotionally and behaviorally to policy opportunity cues. I test the major claims of this model with data from an original experiment and national survey. Findings from the studies indicate that expressions of hope carry a strong and consistent mobilizing effect on the political participation of African Americans, while producing null effects on White participation. I discuss the implications of this model for our understanding of the potential of hope to shape appraisals and perceptions of efficacy among socially marginalized groups, opening up a distinct pathway through which they can be mobilized for political engagement.
BASE
Black hope floats: Racial emotion regulation and the uniquely motivating effects of hope on black political participation
Drawing upon theories of group based emotion, group based efficacy and appraisal, I propose a model of racial emotion regulation to explain variations in how Black and White Americans respond emotionally and behaviorally to policy opportunity cues. I test the major claims of this model with data from an original experiment and national survey. Findings from the studies indicate that expressions of hope carry a strong and consistent mobilizing effect on the political participation of African Americans, while producing null effects on White participation. I discuss the implications of this model for our understanding of the potential of hope to shape appraisals and perceptions of efficacy among socially marginalized groups, opening up a distinct pathway through which they can be mobilized for political engagement. ; peerReviewed ; publishedVersion
BASE
From emotion to action among Asian Americans: assessing the roles of threat and identity in the age of Trump
In: Politics, Groups, and Identities, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 357-372
ISSN: 2156-5511
Clarifying the "People Like Me": Racial Efficacy and Political Behavior
In: Perspectives on politics, S. 1-18
ISSN: 1541-0986
Political efficacy, or a sense of confidence that "people like me" can understand politics and receive responsiveness from government, is central to the study of political behavior. However, the reference group that respondents view as "people like me" is not always immediately clear. This limits our ability to infer how efficacy informs political participation. We propose a specific concept and operationalization of racial group efficacy, and we distinguish this concept from racial identity, group consciousness, and conventional efficacy measures. Analyses of data from the 2016 Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey reveal that for white, Black, Asian, and Latina/o Americans, racial efficacy is a more consistent and robust predictor of political participation than standard internal and external efficacy measures. Further, we show that racial efficacy exhibits associations with conventional and unconventional forms of participation that distinguish whites from people of color. We conclude by discussing how people's racial efficacy informs their engagement in politics, from voting to protests.
The Ties that Bind: Assessing the Effects of Political and Racial Church Homogeneity on Asian American Political Participation
In: Politics and religion: official journal of the APSA Organized Section on Religion and Politics, Band 13, Heft 3, S. 639-670
ISSN: 1755-0491
AbstractResearch consistently emphasizes the importance of religious institutions for influencing political action among Asian Americans. The social capital literature offers two theoretical explanations for why churches increase political activity: bridging capital between different groups and bonding capital among similar groups. The latter argues that individuals who attend racially homogeneous churches are more participatory. This paper expands on these accounts by examining another aspect of bonding. That is, how does similarity in political views among church members affect Asian Americans' political participation? Results from the 2016 Collaborative Multi-Racial Post-Election Survey show that Asian Americans who attend politically homogeneous churches are more likely to vote and participate in conventional activities. The effects of racial homogeneity are limited once taking political homogeneity into consideration. These findings provide evidence that political homophily within religious organizations may facilitate the bonding of social capital between racial/ethnic minorities, and this homophily is indeed salient to democratic participation.
Framing police and protesters: assessing volume and framing of news coverage post-Ferguson, and corresponding impacts on legislative activity
In: Politics, Groups, and Identities, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 151-164
ISSN: 2156-5511